62 Group Check In 12JAN2026
Date: January 12, 2026
62.1 Attendees
- Adam Devlin
- Patty Burns
- Brianna Hayward
- Genevieve Saldibar
- Ava McCune
62.2 Fieldwork Planning Updates (Adam Devlin)
62.2.1 School District Partnerships
- Lakeville Area Schools: Overlaps with old till physiographic unit, currently on board
- Orono Schools: Located near Lake Minnetonka with one large campus, has expressed interest in partnership including educational component
- Maplewood/Oakdale/North St. Paul School District: Covers East St. Paul Metro area including Washington County on east side of metro where coverage has been limited. Meeting scheduled to discuss project details. District has undergone recent renovations and rebuilding, providing fresh grounds for soil development perspective
62.2.2 Summer Fieldwork Preparation
- Meeting planned with Nic to discuss fieldwork logistics and availability
- Team availability confirmation requested for summer fieldwork planning
- Brianna: Interested in participating, will discuss position with Nic, likely focusing on data entry while helping with fieldwork a couple times per week
- Genevieve: Will be around in some capacity but summer schedule uncertain
- Ava: Summer plans undetermined
- Patty: NRCS can provide helpers on days when team is short-staffed
- Undergraduate help expected, potentially including returning staff from previous season and Julia
62.2.3 Pre-Season Training Initiatives
- Classroom session planned to review description sheets and ensure consistent methodology across team
- Texture calibration session using samples covering full spectrum (Ava has materials prepared)
- Practice field days to ease into fieldwork, avoiding previous issue where field review days threw new team members into complex situations
- Goal is dedicated practice time in field before intensive work begins
62.2.4 Bulk Density Sampling
- Plan to incorporate more bulk density sampling this season
- May not be conducted at every site but will gather important data where feasible
62.3 Data Entry and Analysis Progress
62.3.1 Overview
- Team working through 2024 and 2025 pedons with various classification and analysis tasks
- Discussion of methodological approaches and need for systematic documentation
62.3.2 Particle Size Classification (Genevieve)
- Continuing work on general particle size class classification for soil taxonomy at family level
- Will maintain current focus on this task
62.3.3 Particle Size Classification (Brianna)
- Working on particle size classification
- Tracking thicknesses used in calculations on Google Sheets
- Has entered previous data and continues updating as work progresses
- May take on additional HTM (human-transported material) specific particle size analysis after completing 2025 pedons
- Will use weighted averages or weighted texture values systematically
- Will follow up via email to clarify approach, which may vary depending on amount of HTM found
- For pedons with 150 centimeters of HTM, detailed analysis may not be necessary as it would match family-level particle size class, though comprehensive coverage may still be valuable
62.3.4 Anthrodensic Criteria (Adam and Patty)
- Adam currently reviewing each pedon for anthrodensic indicators, noting 2-3 pieces of evidence in pedon notes
- Making recommendations for horizon changes (adding D designation where appropriate)
- Will create formal list of criteria used for calling something anthrodensic
- List will be added to Box document where key is located
- Patty reviewed Adam’s notes on 2024 pedons, will address comments and add notes to NASIS as needed
62.3.5 Aquic Criteria
- Adam will develop better justification for wet criteria and evaluate potential changes
62.3.6 HTM Classification Approach Discussion
- Current approach: Based on field descriptions and observations
- Patty noted some soils may be HTM in part but not fully meet criteria, raising question of how to classify partial HTM
- Discussion of challenges around inconsistent documentation in older pedon descriptions where HTM features may not have been noted
- Team discussed need for more scientific, systematic approach rather than averaging or estimating
- Recognition that some pedons may have been classified as non-HTM when they should have been HTM due to incomplete field observations
62.4 Data Entry Tracker and Organization
62.4.1 NASIS Data Entry Status
- Genevieve: Has 20 remaining pedons to enter, currently at 15 of 20
- Brianna: Working through final pedons but facing slow NASIS performance
- Adam: Working on entering and correlating 2024 data
62.4.2 Correlation and Component Review
- Adam reviewing components, correlations, and DMU (delineation map unit) assignments
- Checking consistency and appropriateness of classifications
- Will reach out to individual team members with specific questions as issues arise
62.5 Action Items
- Adam: Schedule regular meeting with Nic regarding fieldwork planning
- Adam: Create formal list of anthrodensic criteria and add to Box document
- Adam: Develop better justification for aquic (wet) criteria
- Adam: Continue reviewing components, correlations, and DMU assignments
- Adam: Reach out to team members individually regarding specific classification questions
- Brianna: Follow up via email to clarify HTM particle size analysis approach
- Brianna: Consider taking on HTM-specific particle size work after completing 2025 pedons
- Patty: Review Adam’s 2024 pedon notes and add necessary notes to NASIS
- Patty: Compile list of NRCS helpers available for fieldwork support
- Team: Confirm summer fieldwork availability as plans develop
- All: Prepare for pre-season training sessions including classroom review and field practice days