63 Group Check In 26JAN2026
Date: January 26, 2026
63.1 Attendees
- Nora Pearson
- Ava McCune
- Brianna Hayward
- Adam Devlin
- Gen Saldibar
- Mes Tat-Siaka
63.2 Lab Work Progress
63.2.1 Sample Sieving Status (Ava)
- Only 400 samples remaining to sieve total
- All priority samples have already been saved
- Thanks to Mez and Kylie for working hard over break
- Goal: Complete all priority samples by end of March
63.2.2 2025 Pedon Data Entry (Brianna)
- All 2025 pedons have been entered into system
- Data is ready for export to Patty when needed
- Nora will export additional pedons for Patty this week, but Patty has sufficient work currently
63.3 Classification and Analysis Work
63.3.1 Concept Key Editing (Adam)
- Received feedback from Randy and Patty on current concept key, has not made edits yet
- Continuing work on classifying 2025 pedons
- Gen also working on pedon classification
63.3.2 Anthrodensic Features Analysis (Adam and Gen)
- Identifying and documenting anthropic artifacts, anthrodensic features, and anthropic truncation in pedons
- Need to develop better acronym or shorthand for these features
- Randy provided feedback on mappability of these features
- Work progressing slowly but steadily
63.3.3 Randy’s Availability
- Randy out of office until February 9th
- Cannot be reached directly until next bimonthly meeting
63.4 Raster Mapping and Data Work (Nora)
- Current work will eventually become the raster map for project
- Progress ongoing with data processing
- eBook broke during last update, unable to load previous meeting minutes on eBook platform
- Reviewed action items from previous meeting via core file
- No urgent action items identified from previous meeting
63.5 Residential Reports
63.5.1 Timeline and Resident Communications (Gen)
- A few residents have sent follow-up emails about sending results
- Gen managing expectations based on timeline provided during setup; no urgent pressure
63.5.2 Addresses for 2025 (Gen)
- Gen ready to add more addresses to 2025 database when needed
- Currently shifted focus to other tasks and will resume when processing done
63.5.3 Report Components and Template Development
63.5.3.1 Lab Data Status (Ava)
- Still working through priority samples, including most residential sites
- Planning to discuss additional lab tests with Nic
- Residential sites are prioritized in sample processing
63.5.3.2 Report Structure and Templates (Adam and Team)
- Report will include multiple components: lab data, soil formation narrative, parent material history, pXRF results for lead and arsenic
- Lab data flowing in at varying pace
- Draft residential reports in advance while waiting for complete lab data
63.5.3.3 Template Content (Kasia, completed)
- Good draft template already created by Kasia
- Copy-paste paragraphs prepared for different parent materials:
- Glacial Till
- Outwash
- River system
- Anoka Sand Plain
- Lacustrine
- Old Till
- HTM (Human-Transported Material)
- Paragraphs about lead values with conditional inclusion based on concentration ranges
- Template designed for maximum copy-paste efficiency
- Individual site customization will be minimal and quick
- Unique features (such as buried surfaces) can be noted with couple of sentences
63.5.3.4 Workflow Suggestion (Adam)
- Team members looking for work can begin drafting residential reports now
- Process can be done incrementally:
- Set up initial reports with site data
- Write about parent material history and formation
- Check pXRF sheets for concerning lead or arsenic values
- Add information about contaminants
- Store in draft folder
- Add lab data as it becomes available
- Does not need to be completed in single session
- Can be drafted and refined over time
63.6 pXRF Analysis and Priority Flagging (Adam)
63.6.1 pXRF Processing
- Tracking lead and arsenic values from pXRF analysis
- Created document in lab data folder under “pXRF exports” with Pb results
- Document highlights sites with high lead and provides context
63.6.2 Sample Progress Tracking
- Updated 2025 sample progress sheet with PXRF results
- Marked samples as analyzed
- Specified presence of high lead, high arsenic, or both
63.6.3 Priority Assessment
- Evaluating concern level based on location context
- Industrial sites with high values noted but lower priority. Residential sites with high topsoil lead or arsenic flagged as concerning
- Added priority tags for samples with potentially high lead or arsenic
- Team members working on residential reports can reference these tags to prioritize which reports to prepare first
63.7 Data Requests and Communications
63.7.1 Current Data Requests
- Only requests received so far have been from Nora’s friends and contacts
- Requests are curiosity-based rather than urgent. Not being used to inform land management or gardening decisions for current season
63.8 Action Items
- Adam: Edit concept key based on Randy and Patty feedback
- Adam: Continue classifying 2025 pedons
- Adam: Develop better shorthand/acronym for anthrodensic features
- Gen: Continue pedon classification work
- Gen: Add addresses to 2025 database when needed (awaiting notification)
- Nora: Export additional pedons for Patty this week
- Nora: Continue raster mapping data work
- Team: Consider starting draft residential reports as capacity allows
- Team: Reference pXRF priority flags when determining which residential reports to prioritize